{"id":2580,"date":"2011-04-03T13:25:02","date_gmt":"2011-04-03T12:25:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/?p=2580"},"modified":"2011-04-08T16:15:00","modified_gmt":"2011-04-08T15:15:00","slug":"goldstone-retraction-reaction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/2011\/04\/03\/goldstone-retraction-reaction\/","title":{"rendered":"Goldstone Retraction Reaction"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"tweet_button92\" style=\"float: right; margin-left: 10px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/share\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"twitter-share-button\" data-url=\"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/2011\/04\/03\/goldstone-retraction-reaction\/\" data-text=\"Goldstone Retraction Reaction - Ray Cook - As I See It\" data-count=\"horizontal\" data-lang=\"en\" data-via=\"tweetbutton\"  data-related=\"coderplus:Wordpress Tips and more.\"><\/a><\/div><div id=\"attachment_2567\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/goldstone.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2567\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2567\" title=\"goldstone\" src=\"http:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/goldstone-300x180.jpg\" alt=\"Judge Richard Goldstone\" width=\"300\" height=\"180\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/goldstone-300x180.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/goldstone.jpg 311w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2567\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo by Reuters<\/p><\/div>\n<p>As I foretold <a href=\"http:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/2011\/04\/03\/has-goldstone-really-recanted-and-what-is-the-true-impact-of-his-washington-post-op-ed\/\">yesterday<\/a>, Goldstone&#8217;s retraction is being dissed by the usual suspects.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jpost.com\/MiddleEast\/Article.aspx?id=214924\">Jpost<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p><em>Senior  Fatah Central Committee member Nabil Shaath on Sunday said that Judge  Richard Goldstone apparently succumbed to pressure because he could not  longer bear the terror directed against him, apparently referring to the  way Goldstone was ostracized by his native South African and other  world Jewish communities.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Fatah has an interesting and surprisingly broad view of the definition of &#8216;terror&#8217; considering its unending blood libels, antisemitic smears and glorification of terrorist &#8216;martyrs&#8217; (read murderers).<\/p>\n<p>Surely Goldstone would have made the world aware of the &#8216;terror&#8217; against him. What a pathetic response by Shaath.<\/p>\n<p>Yasser Abed Rabbo, a PLO Executive, said (same article):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;There  was a war crime,&#8221; he said, adding that Goldstone has no right to  retract a report based on documents that were examined by the parties  and subject to specific criteria, not on a personal whim.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, Goldstone&#8217;s clear realisation that two years of Israeli investigation and evidence as opposed to complete silence from Hamas amounts to &#8216;whim&#8217;. Who are &#8216;the parties&#8217; and what are the &#8216;criteria&#8217; of which he speaks? Goldstone has every right to redress a wrong which he has previously signed up to. Just by stating he has no right doesn&#8217;t make it so unless you live in the Looking-Glass world of Palestinian politics.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri on Saturday dismissed Judge Richard  Goldstone&#8217;s &#8220;regrets,&#8221; saying that &#8220;his retreat does not change the fact  war  crimes had been committed against 1.5 million people in Gaza,&#8221; and  claimed that the group cooperated fully with the fact finding mission.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So the 1400 has now become 1.5 million. Hamas&#8217; inflated language and posturing is in the face of Goldstone&#8217;s prior and continuing claims of war crimes by Hamas against, shall we say, 7 million Israelis. Their lack of a credible response to the original report&#8217;s findings are completely ignored in favour of the usual sloganising.<\/p>\n<p>So it seems that the original findings are the ones that the Palestinians and all the other Israel-haters will accept because it is rather inconvenient to accept any retraction. The &#8216;war crimes&#8217; stand, even though the person who made the claim has now retracted his conclusions.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t see how they can maintain this stance if the UNHRC now throws out the report. But as the UNHRC is loaded with countries who are somewhat antipathetic towards Israel, there could be an interesting few months ahead.<\/p>\n<p>The PCHR \u00a0is also at it, as <a href=\"Raji Sourani, chairman of the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, said this morning (Sunday) because of regret expressed by Judge Richard Goldstone on the report written by the recent war in Gaza, &quot;an expression of personal opinion and not affect the dialog&quot; report. He claims that Goldstone was in the past two years &quot;a psychological war waged by Jewish and Israeli organizations press him to change his position.&quot; He added that Goldstone may not regret his report because it &quot;would ruin his reputation\">reported<\/a> by walla.co.il (translation)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>Raji Sourani, chairman of the Palestinian Center for Human Rights, said this morning (Sunday) the regret expressed by Judge Richard Goldstone on the report written about the recent war in Gaza is, &#8220;an expression of personal opinion and will not affect the dialog&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em> <\/em><em>He claims that Goldstone was in the past two years &#8220;faced a psychological war waged by Jewish and Israeli organizations to press him to change his position.&#8221; He added that Goldstone should not retract his report because it &#8220;would ruin his reputation&#8221;.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So it&#8217;s those pesky Zionists again. No-one, it appears, is big enough to accept Goldstone&#8217;s retraction if they hate Israel.<\/p>\n<p>Pretty predictable really.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<div class=\"tweet_button92\" style=\"float: right; margin-left: 10px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/share\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\"twitter-share-button\" data-url=\"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/2011\/04\/03\/goldstone-retraction-reaction\/\" data-text=\"Goldstone Retraction Reaction - Ray Cook - As I See It\" data-count=\"horizontal\" data-lang=\"en\" data-via=\"tweetbutton\"  data-related=\"coderplus:Wordpress Tips and more.\"><\/a><\/div><p>As I foretold yesterday, Goldstone&#8217;s retraction is being dissed by the usual suspects. The Jpost: Senior Fatah Central Committee member Nabil Shaath on Sunday said that Judge Richard Goldstone apparently succumbed to pressure because he could not longer bear the terror directed against him, apparently referring to the way Goldstone was ostracized by his native [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,223],"tags":[179,1142,12,881,882,883,880],"class_list":["post-2580","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-israel-and-gaza","category-israel-palestine","tag-fatah","tag-goldstone","tag-hamas","tag-palestinian-views","tag-pchr","tag-plo","tag-retraction","post-preview"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2580","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2580"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2580\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2584,"href":"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2580\/revisions\/2584"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2580"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2580"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.raymondcook.net\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}